WELLOG                                        ACOUSTIC VELOCITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

Part III, page 4

 

 

Effect of Porosity:

 

The effect of porosity is to reduce the velocity of stress waves. Wyllie et al. (1956, 1958) relates bulk velocity Vb to matrix velocity Vma and fluid velocity Vf to formation porosity (F) as follows:

 

                                               

                                    1/Vb = F/Vf + (1-F)/Vma                                                                                 (3-1)

 

 

 

Where:

            F             = Porosity

            Vma      = velocity of sound in matrix

            Vf         = velocity of sound in fluid

            Vb        = Bulk Velocity

 

Equation 3-1 is often referred to as the time-average formula or Wyllie’s equation.

 

Note also that when laboratory data was obtained (Gregory, 1977) comparing the time-average formula, 90 percent of the data was within 5 percent of calculated, 50 percent of the data was within 2 percent of calculated and 30 percent of the data was within 1 percent of calculated porosity for a quartz-water system. The time-average line represents the best fit for the laboratory data.

 

 

Rearranging equation 3.1 and using Dt for calculation of porosity (F);

 

 

                                                Dt -  Dt(ma)

                                    F =      --------------                                                                                          (3-2)

                                                Dt(f) - Dt(ma)

 

Where:            

 

F          = Porosity (%)

            Dt         = travel time per ft from acoustic log

Dt (ma) = matrix travel time

            Dt (f)    = fluid travel time

 

 

Dt (ma) shaly sandstone varies from 60 to 70 usec per ft.

Dt (ma) sandstone varies from 50 to 58 usec per ft.

Dt (ma) limestone varies from 43 to 50 usec per ft.

Dt (ma) Dolomite varies from 40 to 43 usec per ft.

 

 

 

This equation is often referred to as the “time-average” formula.  It is the formula for the velocity obtained from the average time for a wave to propagate through a formation of thickness = 1, of which fraction p is fluid and (1-p) is matrix.

 

 

Equations 3-1, 3-2  are the most common equations used in acoustic logging. Most of the applications using acoustic logging have the purpose of obtaining porosity.

 

Restrictions applied to equation 3-2 are as follows.  This equation was developed using unconsolidated sedimentary rock. It is applicable only to fully saturated pore space up to 35 percent porosity. Pore fluid must be liquid – not gas-filled.

 

Equation 3-2 does not apply to secondary porosity in the form of fractures and vugs as referenced below.

 

Fractures on a scale of 5 cm per meter of depth represent 5 percent porosity. Acoustic tool response may show porosities on a scale of 50 percent porosity.

 

Correction for excessive shale:

 

Shale affects acoustic velocity. Laminar or structural shale is denser and therefore has a matrix velocity different than the rest of the matrix.

 

Shale volume (Vsh) is obtained from gamma-ray or SP logs obtained in shale formations adjacent to the formation of interest. 

 

 

Using  Dt(sh), the apparent change in porosity (dfsh) may be determined as follows:

 

 

                                                dfsh = vsh  * (Dt(sh) - Dt(ma))/ (Dt(f) - Dt(ma))                                     (3-3)

 

 

Equation 3-2 may be corrected for shale when Dt in shale, Dt(sh) exceeds 100 usec/ft. using:

 

                                    100

                                    ----                                                                                                                   (3-4)

                                    Dt(sh)

 

 

Effect of gas and shale Chart

 

 

Uncertainties in acoustic porosity:

 

Studies have shown matrix velocities in a given Limestone or Sandstone matrix may vary 4.3 usec. per ft. (Gregory, 1977). Considering the velocity uncertainty gives a porosity uncertainty of 2.15 percent.

 

Other acoustic porosity models include the Gassmann, Biot, and Brandt.

 

 

 

                                                            [Back]               [Next]

 

 

 

REVISED 11-24-2023      © 2004 - 2023 WELLOG      All Rights Reserved